Transnational voting rights and policies in violent democracies: a global comparison

Transnational voting rights and policies in violent democracies: a global comparison

Blog Article

Abstract In recent decades more than one hundred countries have enfranchised their diasporas, allowing emigrants to vote from abroad.However, this widespread formal recognition of extraterritorial voting rights does not always lead to increased participation of emigrants in home country black knight darts politics.Migrant-sending countries have complex relationships with their diasporas, and this relationship is particularly fraught for countries with endemic violence.This article leverages a new dataset documenting the adoption and implementation of extraterritorial voting rights and restrictions for 195 countries from 1950 to 2020 to demonstrate how transnational voting rights and policies in violent democracies differ from other regimes.While violent democracies extend transnational voting rights to their emigrants at rates comparable to other regime types, they are less likely to implement those rights, and when they royal fryer rft-50 do implement them, they are more likely to restrict them to insulate domestic politics from external influence.